MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00059

Медицинская библиотека · International surgery · 2014

Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection.

Cong Zhi-jie, Hu Liang-hao, Xing Jun-jie, Bian Zheng-qian, Fu Chuan-gang, Yu En-da, Li Zhao-shen, Zhong Ming

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Anastomotic dehiscence (AD) requiring reoperation is the most severe complication following anterior rectal resection. We performed a systematic review on studies that describe AD requiring reoperation and its subsequent mortality after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. A systematic search was performed on published literature. Data on the definition and rate of AD, the number of ADs requiring reoperation, the mortality caused by AD, and the overall postoperative mortality were pooled and analyzed. A total of 39 studies with 24,232 patients were analyzed. The studies varied in incidence and definition of AD. Systematic review of the data showed that the overall rate of AD was 8.6%, and the rate of AD requiring reoperation was 5.4%. The postoperative mortality caused by AD was 0.4%, and the overall postoperative mortality was 1.3%. We found considerable risk and mortality for AD requiring reoperation, which largely contributed to the overall postoperative mortality.

Для цитирования: Cong Zhi-jie, Hu Liang-hao, Xing Jun-jie, Bian Zheng-qian, Fu Chuan-gang, Yu En-da, Li Zhao-shen, Zhong Ming. Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection.. International surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00059.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.