MedElevator
Войти в исследования European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2026
Invasive lobular and ductal breast cancers: a systematic review and metanalysis in association with BRCA1/2 mutation status.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Corso Giovanni, Andreon Chiara, La Vecchia Carlo, Bottazzoli Elisa Ileana, Abruzzese Giuliarianna, Favilla Karin, Citterio Olivia, Spoldi Elena, Di Silvestre Susanna, De Scalzi Alessandra Margherita, Polizzi Andrea, Meduri Eleonora, Trapani Dario, Nicosia Luca, Pesapane Filippo, Bossi Daniela, Brogi Edi, Shen Sherry, Mukhtar Rita, Criscitiello Carmen, Veronesi Paolo, Gandini Sara, Magnoni Francesca, Curigliano Giuseppe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) differs from invasive ductal breast carcinoma (IDC) with respect to genetic alterations and risk factors. We aimed to quantify differences in the prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations between these two patients' populations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search to extract data on the association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and breast cancer (BC) histological subtype (ILC and IDC). Summary odds ratios (SOR) and 95% CI were calculated using random effects univariate and bivariate models and between-study heterogeneity investigated through meta-regression and subgroup analyses.
RESULTS: Twelve studies, published between 1998 and 2025, were considered, including 8004 BC women. BRCA1 mutations were significantly less frequent in patients with ILC than IDC (SOR=0.32, 95%CI (0.16-0.65)) whereas no association was found overall for BRCA2 (SOR=1.28, 95%CI (0.95-1.72)). The difference between the association with BRCA1 and BRCA2 was statistically significant (p-value<0.001). There was no indication of publication bias in BRCA1 (Egger's and Begg's test p-value=0.23, 0.12). The between study heterogeneity was 29% in BRCA1 and 0% in BRCA2. Excluding papers with high risk of bias, BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with ILC than in IDC (SOR=2.56, 95%CI (1.15-5.7)). This association was primarily driven by the bivariate random-effects model, which accounts for the correlation between BRCA1 and BRCA2 estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: In studies with lower risk of bias, germline BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with ILC than IDC. Conversely, BRCA1 mutations are more frequently observed in IDC, particularly among younger patients and those with a positive family history of BC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search to extract data on the association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and breast cancer (BC) histological subtype (ILC and IDC). Summary odds ratios (SOR) and 95% CI were calculated using random effects univariate and bivariate models and between-study heterogeneity investigated through meta-regression and subgroup analyses.
RESULTS: Twelve studies, published between 1998 and 2025, were considered, including 8004 BC women. BRCA1 mutations were significantly less frequent in patients with ILC than IDC (SOR=0.32, 95%CI (0.16-0.65)) whereas no association was found overall for BRCA2 (SOR=1.28, 95%CI (0.95-1.72)). The difference between the association with BRCA1 and BRCA2 was statistically significant (p-value<0.001). There was no indication of publication bias in BRCA1 (Egger's and Begg's test p-value=0.23, 0.12). The between study heterogeneity was 29% in BRCA1 and 0% in BRCA2. Excluding papers with high risk of bias, BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with ILC than in IDC (SOR=2.56, 95%CI (1.15-5.7)). This association was primarily driven by the bivariate random-effects model, which accounts for the correlation between BRCA1 and BRCA2 estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: In studies with lower risk of bias, germline BRCA2 mutations were more frequent in patients with ILC than IDC. Conversely, BRCA1 mutations are more frequently observed in IDC, particularly among younger patients and those with a positive family history of BC.