MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2007

Experience with meconium peritonitis.

Nam So Hyun, Kim Seong Chul, Kim Dae Yeon, Kim Ai Rhan, Kim Ki Soo, Pi Soo Yung, Won Hye Sung, Kim In Koo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Meconium peritonitis is a sterile chemical peritonitis resulting from intrauterine bowel perforation. With the development of neonatal care, the prognosis of meconium peritonitis improved much. We report our clinical experience.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with meconium peritonitis admitted to the Asan Medical Center from June 1989 to July 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients (17 males, 24 females), 38 (92.7%) were suspected to suffer from meconium peritonitis prenatally, at a median gestational age of 32 weeks (range, 21-40 weeks). The most common prenatal sonographic finding was fetal ascites followed by dilated bowel. Ten patients were managed conservatively, but 31 patients underwent operations including resection and anastomosis (22), drainage procedure (4), ileostomy (3) and primary repair (2). The operative 31 cases comprised generalized (16), fibroadhesive (10), and cystic types (5). The main causes were intestinal atresia and idiopathic bowel perforation. The mortality rate was 2.4%, and the morbidity rate was 34.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Good survival rate was achieved. But there was rather high morbidity. More gentle and delicate approach should be done to lower the morbidity.

Для цитирования: Nam So Hyun, Kim Seong Chul, Kim Dae Yeon, Kim Ai Rhan, Kim Ki Soo, Pi Soo Yung, Won Hye Sung, Kim In Koo. Experience with meconium peritonitis.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.07.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.