BMC anesthesiology · 2026
Topical use of tranexamic acid for antifibrinolysis in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized clinical study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tuerhong Dilnaar, Li Chen-Xi, Yan Lei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the non-inferiority of topical intrapericardial tranexamic acid (TXA) versus intravenous TXA for efficacy and safety in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
METHODS: In this single-center randomized trial, 492 patients were assigned 1:1 to topical TXA (2.5 g in 50 mL saline via pericardial drain, clamp 30 min) or standard intravenous TXA.
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate (postoperative to discharge); 30-day composite adverse events (mortality, renal dysfunction, stroke, myocardial infarction, thromboembolism, seizures). Secondary endpoints included drainage volume, coagulation, and thromboelastography (TEG). The non-inferiority threshold was established at 10% for sensitivity.
RESULTS: RBC transfusion rate was 35.0% (topical) vs. 27.6% (intravenous; 95%CI - 1.2% to 16.0%, P = 0.080). Composite adverse events were 9.8% vs. 15.4% (95%CI - 11.2% to 0.0%, P = 0.057). Topical TXA showed delayed coagulation initiation, lower fibrinogen, and higher 24-hour drainage (all P < 0.05). At 10% margin, efficacy non-inferiority was not confirmed, but safety non-inferiority was verified for all endpoints.
CONCLUSION: Topical intrapericardial TXA is non-inferior to intravenous TXA in safety but fails strict efficacy non-inferiority. Intravenous TXA remains first-line; topical TXA is a reasonable alternative for patients intolerant to systemic administration. Dose and timing optimization is needed to improve hemostasis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2500113718, Registration date: 2 December 2025. Retrospectively registratered.
METHODS: In this single-center randomized trial, 492 patients were assigned 1:1 to topical TXA (2.5 g in 50 mL saline via pericardial drain, clamp 30 min) or standard intravenous TXA.
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate (postoperative to discharge); 30-day composite adverse events (mortality, renal dysfunction, stroke, myocardial infarction, thromboembolism, seizures). Secondary endpoints included drainage volume, coagulation, and thromboelastography (TEG). The non-inferiority threshold was established at 10% for sensitivity.
RESULTS: RBC transfusion rate was 35.0% (topical) vs. 27.6% (intravenous; 95%CI - 1.2% to 16.0%, P = 0.080). Composite adverse events were 9.8% vs. 15.4% (95%CI - 11.2% to 0.0%, P = 0.057). Topical TXA showed delayed coagulation initiation, lower fibrinogen, and higher 24-hour drainage (all P < 0.05). At 10% margin, efficacy non-inferiority was not confirmed, but safety non-inferiority was verified for all endpoints.
CONCLUSION: Topical intrapericardial TXA is non-inferior to intravenous TXA in safety but fails strict efficacy non-inferiority. Intravenous TXA remains first-line; topical TXA is a reasonable alternative for patients intolerant to systemic administration. Dose and timing optimization is needed to improve hemostasis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR2500113718, Registration date: 2 December 2025. Retrospectively registratered.