MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina) · 2015

[Workplace violence in Latin America: A review of the scientific evidence].

Ansoleaga Elisa, Gómez-Rubio Constanza, Mauro Amalia

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Workplace Violence has acquired social relevance given the evidence regarding there its health consequences. Has identified various effects such as mood disorders and sleep disorders, hostility, isolation, insecurity, among others.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyze scientific evidence published on workplace violence in studies in Latin American countries between 2009 and 2014.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A descriptive and quantitative study. A search was made on the basis of Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost) Academic Source Premier, PSICODOC, Scielo.org, JSTOR and SCOPUS. And indexed empirical studies were considered.

RESULTS

We worked with 46 selected articles. The studies showed a higher amount of psychological violence at work, with a potential risk in women and health professionals. Also, the analysis categories were the most reported behaviors that express violence, health implications and facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on the study of workplace violence in Latin America is recent. Items are descriptive, interpretative studies with insufficient or analytical nature. Health personnel, particularly women, have conditions of vulnerability, with relevance with regard to sexual harassment, wage inequality and bullying.

Для цитирования: Ansoleaga Elisa, Gómez-Rubio Constanza, Mauro Amalia. [Workplace violence in Latin America: A review of the scientific evidence].. Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina). 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.