Cardiac resynchronization therapy in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Although left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is known to occur in adults with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are not well characterized.
METHODS
We retrospectively divided all patients with repaired TOF and impaired LV ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) undergoing CRT at our institution (n = 10) into two groups: de novo CRT (group A, n = 6) or upgrade from existing device (group B, n = 4). Echocardiograms were reviewed at baseline, medium-term (>6 months post-CRT), and long-term follow-up. CRT response was defined as reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15% at medium term.
RESULTS
Age at surgical repair was 13.1 ± 16.0 years, age at CRT was 44.4 ± 12.5 years, and baseline LVEF was 24.0 ± 10.5%. Group A demonstrated a preponderance of right ventricular (RV) conduction delay, whereas all patients in group B demonstrated RV pacing at baseline. At medium-term follow-up, patients in group A showed significant improvements in LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LVESV. Group B also demonstrated a significant improvement in LVEF with favorable trends in LV volumes. Of nine patients with complete data at medium term, eight showed evidence of CRT response. Average long-term follow-up was 53.4 ± 29.3 months. At long-term follow-up, LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV remained numerically better than baseline, although the results were no longer significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Adult patients with repaired TOF and LV systolic dysfunction demonstrate significant medium-term response to CRT, even among those with RV conduction delay. The long-term impact of CRT in this population requires further characterization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.