MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.12.007

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2022

Prednisolone or tetracosactide depot for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome? A prospective analysis of data embedded within two randomised controlled trials.

Osborne John P, Edwards Stuart W, Alber Fabienne Dietrich, Hancock Eleanor, Johnson Anthony L, Kennedy Colin R, Likeman Marcus, Lux Andrew L, Mackay Mark, Mallick Andrew, Newton Richard W, Nolan Melinda, Pressler Ronit, Rating Dietz, Schmitt Bernhard, Verity Christopher M, O'Callaghan FinbarJ K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report a prospectively planned analysis of two randomised controlled trials with embedded comparisons of prednisolone versus tetracosactide depot for the treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS).

METHODS

Individual patient data from patients randomly allocated to prednisolone or tetracosactide depot were analysed from two trials (UKISS, ICISS). The comparison was embedded within trials in which some patients also received vigabatrin but only patients receiving monotherapy with randomly allocated hormonal treatments are included in this analysis. The main outcome was cessation of spasms (Days 13-14 after randomisation). Lead time to treatment and underlying aetiology were taken into account. Cessation of spasms on Days 14-42 inclusive, electroclinical response (EEG Day 14), plus developmental and epilepsy outcomes (at 14 months in UKISS and 18 months in ICISS) are also reported. Minimum treatment was prednisolone 40 mg per day for two weeks or tetracosactide depot 0·5 mg IM on alternate days for two weeks, all followed by a reducing dose of prednisolone over two weeks.

RESULTS

126 infants were included in this study. On tetracosactide depot, 47 of 62 (76%) were free of spasms on Days 13-14 compared to 43 of 64 (67%) on prednisolone (difference 9%, 95% CI -7·2% to +25·2%, chi square 1·15, p = 0·28). For Day 14-42 cessation of spasms, on tetracosactide depot, 41 of 61 (67%) were free of spasms compared to 35 of 62 (56%) on prednisolone (difference 11%, 95% CI -6·4% to +28·4%, chi square 1·51, p = 0·22). There was no significant difference in mean VABS score between infants who received prednisolone compared with those who received tetracosactide depot (74·8 (SD 18·3) versus 78·0 (SD 20·2) t = -0·91 p = 0·36). The proportion with ongoing epilepsy at the time of developmental assessment was 20 of 61 (33%) in the tetracosactide group compared with 26 out of 63 (41%) in the prednisolone group (difference 8%, 95% CI -9·2% to +25·2%, Chi [2] 0·95, p = 0·33).

SIGNIFICANCE: With hormone monotherapy, either prednisolone or tetracosactide depot may be recommended for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.

Для цитирования: Osborne John P, Edwards Stuart W, Alber Fabienne Dietrich, Hancock Eleanor, Johnson Anthony L, Kennedy Colin R, Likeman Marcus, Lux Andrew L, Mackay Mark, Mallick Andrew, Newton Richard W, Nolan Melinda, Pressler Ronit, Rating Dietz, Schmitt Bernhard, Verity Christopher M, O'Callaghan FinbarJ K. Prednisolone or tetracosactide depot for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome? A prospective analysis of data embedded within two randomised controlled trials.. European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.12.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.