Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2011
Continuous positive airway pressure intolerance associated with elevated nasal resistance is possible mechanism of complex sleep apnea syndrome.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakazaki Chie, Noda Akiko, Yasuda Yoshinari, Nakata Seiichi, Koike Yasuo, Yasuma Fumihiko, Murohara Toyoaki, Nakashima Tsutomu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) is diagnosed after an elimination of obstructive events with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), when a central apnea index ≥5/h or Cheyne-Stokes respiration pattern emerges in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, the pathophysiology of CompSAS remains controversial.
METHODS: Of the 281 patients with suspected OSAS, all of whom underwent polysomnography conducted at Nagoya University Hospital, we enrolled 52 patients with apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h (age 51.4 ± 13.3 years). The polysomnographic findings, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and nasal resistance were compared between the CompSAS patients and OSAS patients.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were diagnosed with OSAS and nine patients with central sleep apnea syndrome by natural sleep PSG. Furthermore, 43 OSAS patients were classified into the OSAS patients (OSAS group, n = 38) and the CompSAS patients (CompSAS group, n = 5) by the night on CPAP PSG. The nasal resistance was significantly higher in CompSAS group than in OSAS group (0.30 ± 0.10 vs. 0.19 ± 0.07 Pa/cm(3)/s, P = 0.004). The arousal index, percentage of stage 1 sleep, and oxygen desaturation index were significantly decreased, and the percentage of stage REM sleep was significantly increased in the OSAS group with the initial CPAP treatment, but not in the CompSAS group. In addition, the patients with CompSAS showed normal LVEF.
CONCLUSION: CPAP intolerance secondary to an elevated nasal resistance might relate to frequent arousals, which could presumably contribute to an increase in central sleep apnea. Further evaluation in a large study is needed to clarify the mechanism of CompSAS.
METHODS: Of the 281 patients with suspected OSAS, all of whom underwent polysomnography conducted at Nagoya University Hospital, we enrolled 52 patients with apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h (age 51.4 ± 13.3 years). The polysomnographic findings, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and nasal resistance were compared between the CompSAS patients and OSAS patients.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were diagnosed with OSAS and nine patients with central sleep apnea syndrome by natural sleep PSG. Furthermore, 43 OSAS patients were classified into the OSAS patients (OSAS group, n = 38) and the CompSAS patients (CompSAS group, n = 5) by the night on CPAP PSG. The nasal resistance was significantly higher in CompSAS group than in OSAS group (0.30 ± 0.10 vs. 0.19 ± 0.07 Pa/cm(3)/s, P = 0.004). The arousal index, percentage of stage 1 sleep, and oxygen desaturation index were significantly decreased, and the percentage of stage REM sleep was significantly increased in the OSAS group with the initial CPAP treatment, but not in the CompSAS group. In addition, the patients with CompSAS showed normal LVEF.
CONCLUSION: CPAP intolerance secondary to an elevated nasal resistance might relate to frequent arousals, which could presumably contribute to an increase in central sleep apnea. Further evaluation in a large study is needed to clarify the mechanism of CompSAS.