Relationship between the angiographically derived SYNTAX score and outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Numerous risk scores have been designed to predict the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score has been shown to predict outcome in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) randomized to PCI or bypass surgery, but its utility in patients with less severe CAD is less well established.
METHODS
We calculated the SYNTAX score in 482 patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/ml) undergoing non-emergency PCI. The study endpoint was 3-year all-cause mortality or repeat revascularization.
RESULTS
The mean age was 69 ± 11 years, 44% were women, 82% had diabetes and they had 1.82 ± 0.78 diseased vessels. The mean creatinine clearance was 67.3 ± 37.2 ml/min. The mean SYNTAX score was 11 ± 8, median of 9 (5-15), tertiles < 7, 7-12 and > 12. There was good interobserver concordance (0.784 and 0.816, p < 0.01, respectively among two pairs of observers). The 3-year estimated survival rate was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.88). By multivariable analysis, creatinine clearance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82 per 10 ml/min, p < 0.001), ejection fraction (HR 0.82 per 10%, p = 0.004) and prior infarction (HR 1.7, p = 0.03) were the only predictors of death. The SYNTAX score did not predict mortality. The incidence of repeat PCI by increasing tertiles of SYNTAX score was 19.2%, 32.2% and 33.2%, respectively, p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION
In patients at high risk for ischemic events without severe CAD, the SYNTAX score is not associated with mortality at 3 years.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.