Quality of Life, Body Image and Personality Traits Among Women Receiving Botulinum Toxin Type a for Cosmetic Purposes.

BACKGROUND

The demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures has rampantly increased in recent decades. The aim of this study was to evaluate the body image, personality traits and quality of life (QoL) in women consuming botulinum toxin type A for cosmetic purposes.

METHODS

This case-control study was conducted on 89 participants referring to outpatient dermatology clinics in Mashhad from 2019 to 2021. All participants completed a checklist of demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as three other questionnaires, including the World-Health-Organization Quality of Life-Short Form, Big 5 Inventory-10 (BFI-10) and Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for body dysmorphic disorder (Y-BOCS-BDD). A control group of 101 sex and age-matched people from the general population also completed the questionnaires online.

RESULTS

All participants were females, and most of them in the case group were 31-50 years old (n = 68, 77.1%). Among the case group, QoL was reported higher in all domains; however, this was only significant in 'physical' (P = 0.003) and 'psychological' (P = 0.036) aspects. After considering the confounding factors, the case group was able to significantly predict increased QoL in the 'physical' (P = 0.019) and 'environmental' (P = 0.015) domains. In terms of BFI-10 scores, conscientiousness was notably higher among the case group (P < 0.001), while the control group scored slightly but significantly higher than the case group in neuroticism (P = 0.019). The control group scored significantly higher in Y-BOCS-BDD (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In clients receiving botulinum toxin injection for cosmetic purposes, QoL was higher than in the control group. No signs of body dysmorphia or pathological personality traits were found in these individuals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .