MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1574-695x.1998.tb01124.x

Медицинская библиотека · FEMS immunology and medical microbiology · 1998

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of two Swedish isolates and two prototypic strains of Coxiella burnetii.

Sjöstedt A, Göransson I, Macellaro A, Norlander L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Two Swedish isolates of Coxiella burnetii and the two prototype strains of the species, Nine Mile and Priscilla, were characterized with regard to their multiplication and cytopathic effect on BGM cells and by PCR-based amplification of repetitive element DNA and the C. burnetii-specific plasmids QpH1 and QpRS. Moreover, 1330 bp of each 16S rRNA gene were sequence-determined. All four strains multiplied at virtually the same rate and displayed the same type of vacuoles in the BGM cells. Genetic homogeneity was observed inasmuch as the 16S rDNA sequences were identical and the strains showed identical PCR amplification patterns using primers specific to enterobacterial repetitive intragenic consensus DNA sequences. The two Swedish strains and the Priscilla strain also showed identical patterns after PCR amplification of repetitive extragenic palindromic DNA sequences, whereas the Nine Mile strain demonstrated a similar, but not identical pattern. Thus, the investigated strains demonstrated very similar phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. This finding is discussed in view of the very rare occurrence of domestic Q fever in Sweden.

Для цитирования: Sjöstedt A, Göransson I, Macellaro A, Norlander L. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of two Swedish isolates and two prototypic strains of Coxiella burnetii.. FEMS immunology and medical microbiology. 1998. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695x.1998.tb01124.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.