MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4244/eij-d-24-00846

Медицинская библиотека · EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025

Distal access and procedural anticoagulation to prevent radial artery occlusion after coronary angiography - the randomised RAPID trial.

Stiermaier Thomas, Grünewälder Matthias, Pätz Toni, Rawish Elias, Joost Alexander, Meusel Moritz, Marquetand Christoph, Kurz Thomas, Schmidt Tobias, Frerker Christian, Fuernau Georg, Eitel Ingo

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Distal transradial access (TRA) and procedural anticoagulation (AC) are among the strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion (RAO) that have some gaps in evidence.

AIMS: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of different radial access sites and procedural AC in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG).

METHODS

The RAPID trial is a single-centre, open-label, 2x2 factorial study that randomised patients to procedural AC versus no procedural AC and also to distal versus conventional TRA with further stratification according to pre-existing oral AC. Patients with indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoints were the incidence of RAO, assessed by vascular ultrasound, and bleeding events.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped early for efficacy by the data and safety monitoring board after the second preplanned interim analysis and inclusion of 600 participants. Excluding patients with indicated PCI, the final study population consisted of 439 patients. Distal TRA was associated with more access site crossovers (14.9% vs 8.3%; p=0.032) and a longer total procedure time (25 min vs 20 min; p=0.001) than conventional TRA. The rates of RAO (20.3% vs 21.2%; p=0.810) and bleeding events (4.1% vs 6.9%; p=0.188) were similar after distal and conventional TRA. In contrast, procedural AC reduced the incidence of RAO (7.3% vs 33.9%; p<0.001) without increasing bleeding risk (7.3% vs 3.6%; p=0.087). These results were consistent in patients on pre-existing oral AC and those with distal TRA.

CONCLUSIONS

While distal TRA did not reduce the risk of RAO, procedural AC proved effective in all patients undergoing transradial CAG including those on pre-existing oral AC. (Strategies to Maintain Radial Artery Patency Following Diagnostic Coronary Angiography [RAPID] trial; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04301921 [RAPID-1] and NCT04362020 [RAPID-2]).

Для цитирования: Stiermaier Thomas, Grünewälder Matthias, Pätz Toni, Rawish Elias, Joost Alexander, Meusel Moritz, Marquetand Christoph, Kurz Thomas, Schmidt Tobias, Frerker Christian, Fuernau Georg, Eitel Ingo. Distal access and procedural anticoagulation to prevent radial artery occlusion after coronary angiography - the randomised RAPID trial.. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2025. DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-24-00846.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.