International journal of clinical practice · 2020
Associations of fear of hypoglycemia with second-line use of insulin secretagogues or insulin and subsequent glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: An analysis using data from the DISCOVER study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Jun-Sing, Chen Hungta, Tang Fengming, Sheu Wayne Huey-Herng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Associations of fear of hypoglycemia with prescription of second-line insulin secretagogues (IS) or insulin and subsequent glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes were analysed using data from the DISCOVER study-a large, prospective, observational study.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating a second-line treatment after a first-line oral therapy were enrolled. Fear of hypoglycemia was assessed using baseline Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS) worry score. Glycemic control was assessed using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 6-month and 1-year follow-up, and HbA1c change from baseline was analysed. To examine the association of baseline HFS worry scores with second-line use of IS or insulin, a hierarchical logistic model with country as random effect was used.
RESULTS: A total of 6217 patients were analysed. The mean HFS worry score was 6.9 ± 11.4, while patients in the upper quartile had an HFS worry score ≥9. We divided patients into three groups according to their baseline HFS worry score (0, 1-8, ≥9). HFS worry score was associated with the use of first-line IS, but not the second-line treatment. Compared to treatments with no IS and insulin, a better HbA1c response to second-line IS or insulin was noted in patients with a baseline HFS worry score of 0 or 1-8, but not in patients with a baseline HFS worry score ≥9.
CONCLUSION: HFS worry score was associated with the use of first-line IS and glycemic response to second-line IS or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02322762. Registered 23 December 2014.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating a second-line treatment after a first-line oral therapy were enrolled. Fear of hypoglycemia was assessed using baseline Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS) worry score. Glycemic control was assessed using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 6-month and 1-year follow-up, and HbA1c change from baseline was analysed. To examine the association of baseline HFS worry scores with second-line use of IS or insulin, a hierarchical logistic model with country as random effect was used.
RESULTS: A total of 6217 patients were analysed. The mean HFS worry score was 6.9 ± 11.4, while patients in the upper quartile had an HFS worry score ≥9. We divided patients into three groups according to their baseline HFS worry score (0, 1-8, ≥9). HFS worry score was associated with the use of first-line IS, but not the second-line treatment. Compared to treatments with no IS and insulin, a better HbA1c response to second-line IS or insulin was noted in patients with a baseline HFS worry score of 0 or 1-8, but not in patients with a baseline HFS worry score ≥9.
CONCLUSION: HFS worry score was associated with the use of first-line IS and glycemic response to second-line IS or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02322762. Registered 23 December 2014.