Thrombosis research · 2024
Understanding European patterns of deprescribing antithrombotic medication during end-of-life care in patients with cancer.
СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martens E S L, Becker D, Abele C, Abbel D, Achterberg W P, Bax J J, Bertoletti L, Edwards M E, Font C, Gava A, Goedegebuur J, Højen A A, Huisman M V, Kruip M J H A, Mahé I, Mooijaart S P, Pearson M, Seddon K, Szmit S, Noble S I R, Klok F A, Konstantinides S V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Even though antithrombotic therapy (ATT) probably has little or even negative effect on the well-being of patients with cancer near the end of life, it is often continued until death, possibly leading to excess bleeding complications, increased disease burden, reduced quality of life and higher healthcare costs.
AIM: To explore and describe European practice patterns and perspectives of healthcare professionals from different disciplines and specialties on ATT in the end-of-life care (EOLC) of patients with cancer.
METHODS: We performed a two-week international cross-sectional survey study using flash-mob research methodology. Eligible were healthcare professionals from different institutions across Europe, who prescribed ATT and/or dealt with EOLC of patients with cancer. The survey comprised three parts, including a series of choice sets (hypothetical scenarios involving a set of characteristics changing in level [e.g., high vs. low thrombotic risk]) on ATT management in EOLC. The discrete choice experiment analysis was conducted using multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Out of 467 pre-registrants, 208 participated in the survey from 4 to 18 July 2023. The majority (53 %) considered a patient with cancer as in EOLC when life expectancy is below 3 months. Respondents reported seeing or treating 20 patients with cancer on ATT in EOLC per year (IQR 10-50). The median estimated frequency of considering ATT deprescription per healthcare professional was 10 times per year (IQR 4-10), while the frequency of actual deprescription was 5 times per year (IQR 2-10). Twenty percent of respondents had never deprescribed ATT in the context of EOLC. Across the eight choice sets, five respondents (2.7 %) found deprescribing inappropriate in any scenario. Deprescribing was more often considered in patients with poor ECOG-performance status, high bleeding risk and low-molecular-weight heparin use as opposed to oral ATT. Haemato-oncology and cardiovascular medicine specialists were more inclined to deprescribe antiplatelet therapy than other specialties.
CONCLUSION: Our study describes medical decision-making regarding ATT in EOLC of patients with cancer. Healthcare professionals' perspectives and practice patterns vary, and some preferences appear associated with the therapists' professional focus and region of practice.
AIM: To explore and describe European practice patterns and perspectives of healthcare professionals from different disciplines and specialties on ATT in the end-of-life care (EOLC) of patients with cancer.
METHODS: We performed a two-week international cross-sectional survey study using flash-mob research methodology. Eligible were healthcare professionals from different institutions across Europe, who prescribed ATT and/or dealt with EOLC of patients with cancer. The survey comprised three parts, including a series of choice sets (hypothetical scenarios involving a set of characteristics changing in level [e.g., high vs. low thrombotic risk]) on ATT management in EOLC. The discrete choice experiment analysis was conducted using multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Out of 467 pre-registrants, 208 participated in the survey from 4 to 18 July 2023. The majority (53 %) considered a patient with cancer as in EOLC when life expectancy is below 3 months. Respondents reported seeing or treating 20 patients with cancer on ATT in EOLC per year (IQR 10-50). The median estimated frequency of considering ATT deprescription per healthcare professional was 10 times per year (IQR 4-10), while the frequency of actual deprescription was 5 times per year (IQR 2-10). Twenty percent of respondents had never deprescribed ATT in the context of EOLC. Across the eight choice sets, five respondents (2.7 %) found deprescribing inappropriate in any scenario. Deprescribing was more often considered in patients with poor ECOG-performance status, high bleeding risk and low-molecular-weight heparin use as opposed to oral ATT. Haemato-oncology and cardiovascular medicine specialists were more inclined to deprescribe antiplatelet therapy than other specialties.
CONCLUSION: Our study describes medical decision-making regarding ATT in EOLC of patients with cancer. Healthcare professionals' perspectives and practice patterns vary, and some preferences appear associated with the therapists' professional focus and region of practice.