Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2019
Injection volume and intracameral moxifloxacin dose.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shorstein Neal H, Gardner Susanne
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To test the effect of injection volume and concentration on dosing and residence time of moxifloxacin in the anterior chamber (AC).
SETTING: Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Moxifloxacin 0.5%/0.05 mL, moxifloxacin 0.5%/0.10 mL, and moxifloxacin 0.15%/0.50 mL were drawn into 5 1.0 mL syringes each, injected into tared vials, and weighed. The doses delivered were calculated. The AC concentrations and elimination rates of the drug for two AC volumes were modeled for each dosing method.
RESULTS: The 0.05 mL injection volume resulted in the greatest range (35 μg) of delivered dose compared with larger injection volumes (≤25 μg). The mathematical model predicted that variation in dosing in each group would result in differences of 12 minutes or less for the presence of the drug in the AC. Injection of 0.5%/0.1 mL produced AC concentrations above 500 μg/mL for 1.9 to 3.0 hours and above 64 μg/mL for 5.5 to 6.5 hours, depending on the AC volume; however, flushing with a 0.15% concentration sustained AC levels for 1.9 hours and 5.5 hours, respectively, for the two AC volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller injection volumes of a higher concentration moxifloxacin resulted in less accuracy and less precision in the delivered dose (0.05 mL, P = .005; 0.10 mL, P = .03); however, the clinical significance of this might vary. Injection of 0.5%/0.1 mL and flushing with 0.15%/0.5 mL of moxifloxacin would provide similar drug AC residence times according to the model. Flushing provided more consistent AC concentrations with differing AC volumes.
SETTING: Kaiser Permanente, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Moxifloxacin 0.5%/0.05 mL, moxifloxacin 0.5%/0.10 mL, and moxifloxacin 0.15%/0.50 mL were drawn into 5 1.0 mL syringes each, injected into tared vials, and weighed. The doses delivered were calculated. The AC concentrations and elimination rates of the drug for two AC volumes were modeled for each dosing method.
RESULTS: The 0.05 mL injection volume resulted in the greatest range (35 μg) of delivered dose compared with larger injection volumes (≤25 μg). The mathematical model predicted that variation in dosing in each group would result in differences of 12 minutes or less for the presence of the drug in the AC. Injection of 0.5%/0.1 mL produced AC concentrations above 500 μg/mL for 1.9 to 3.0 hours and above 64 μg/mL for 5.5 to 6.5 hours, depending on the AC volume; however, flushing with a 0.15% concentration sustained AC levels for 1.9 hours and 5.5 hours, respectively, for the two AC volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller injection volumes of a higher concentration moxifloxacin resulted in less accuracy and less precision in the delivered dose (0.05 mL, P = .005; 0.10 mL, P = .03); however, the clinical significance of this might vary. Injection of 0.5%/0.1 mL and flushing with 0.15%/0.5 mL of moxifloxacin would provide similar drug AC residence times according to the model. Flushing provided more consistent AC concentrations with differing AC volumes.