MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11255-023-03697-9

Медицинская библиотека · International urology and nephrology · 2023

Development of a novel mesh model to define a new index "amount of stone" to evaluate calculus and predicting the lithotripsy time.

Wei Bingjian, Fu Yang, Ma Aidi, Hong Li, Wang Yunyan, Gu Shuo, Ji Lu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Develop a mesh model to define a new "index amount of stone" to evaluate calculus and predict lithotripsy time.

METHODS

The stones were divided into target units with diameter of 5 mm by the mesh from x, y and z directions, and the cross-sectional areas between units were calculated as amount of stone as a new index to evaluate calculus. Design a prospective study with 112 cases of percutaneous nephrolithotomy to verify the reliability of this index, and to compare the accuracy of the quantity, volume and maximum diameter of stones in predicting the time of lithotripsy.

RESULTS

Amount of stone (Q) is reliable. The lithotripsy time was significantly correlated with the amount of stone, volume and maximum diameter of the stone (p < 0.01). The three regression equations were valid. The linear fit in the amount group was larger than that in the volume group, and further larger than that in the maximum diameter group, with R2 values of 0.716, 0.661 and 0.471, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is more accurate and convenient to use amount of stone to evaluate calculus, which can be used to predict the lithotripsy time.

Для цитирования: Wei Bingjian, Fu Yang, Ma Aidi, Hong Li, Wang Yunyan, Gu Shuo, Ji Lu. Development of a novel mesh model to define a new index "amount of stone" to evaluate calculus and predicting the lithotripsy time.. International urology and nephrology. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03697-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.