MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.02.009

Медицинская библиотека · European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2012

Laryngeal chondrosarcoma: repeated laser and radiofrequency ablation in the palliative setting.

Perrot C, Cortese S, Eluecque H, Mastronicola R, Sergeant C, Marchal F, Demet S, Dolivet G

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the use of radiofrequency and laser ablation in head and neck oncology and to describe the management of a case of laryngeal chondrosarcoma in a 90-year-old patient.

CASE REPORT: A 90-year-old man, WHO performance status 3, with low-grade laryngeal chondrosarcoma was seen in the outpatients department at the end of 2008 for assessment of dysphonia. Total laryngectomy was considered to be too invasive and was consequently excluded. The patient was initially tracheotomized under local anaesthesia to relieve dyspnoea and was subsequently managed symptomatically by radiofrequency and laser ablation to ensure laryngeal disobstruction, allowing the patient to be extubated followed by speech therapy and oral feeding rehabilitation.

DISCUSSION/

CONCLUSION

This patient received symptomatic palliative treatment with a combination of radiofrequency and laser. Radiofrequency ablation can be applied in head and neck oncology as an alternative treatment to surgery allowing improvement of quality of life and survival.

Для цитирования: Perrot C, Cortese S, Eluecque H, Mastronicola R, Sergeant C, Marchal F, Demet S, Dolivet G. Laryngeal chondrosarcoma: repeated laser and radiofrequency ablation in the palliative setting.. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.02.009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.