DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.047
A Novel Application of Decipher Testing in HoLEP Specimens for Risk Stratification of Incidentally Detected Prostate Cancer.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility of Decipher testing for prostate cancer incidentally identified on specimens from holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Additionally, we sought to review Decipher GRID expression signatures in cancers identified on HoLEP compared to those identified on prostate biopsy.
METHODS
We identified patients who had prostate cancer on HoLEP at our institution from August 2021 to July 2024 and subsequently underwent Decipher testing. Quality assurance testing was performed and transcriptomic signature expression patterns between HoLEP specimens and Grade Group (GG)-matched biopsy specimens were compared using standard mean differences (SMD).
RESULTS
Of the 38 HoLEP specimens that underwent Decipher testing, 2 (5.3%) failed quality assurance testing due to lack of sufficient tumor present in the sample. Compared to GG-matched biopsy specimens (N=58,500), the HoLEP group (N=36) had similar median Decipher scores (0.56 vs 0.45, SMD 0.33) and lower median PSA (3.1 vs 6.2). HoLEP specimens were enriched for lower androgen receptor activity (SMD 0.63), basal subtypes by both PAM50 (SMD 1.23) and PSC (SMD 1.09), and ERG negative status (SMD 0.86). HoLEP specimens also had higher expression of activated CD4 (SMD 1.06), tertiary lymphoid structure (SMD 1.40), and angiogenesis (SMD 1.27).
CONCLUSION
Decipher testing for HoLEP specimens is feasible, although clinical utility remains unclear. Compared to biopsy specimens, HoLEP specimens have increased immune and angiogenesis-related signature expression and lower AR-A expression suggesting that these tumors have unique microenvironments.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.