Implanting Cardiac Electronic Devices with Uninterrupted Antithrombotic Therapy: A Novel Approach to Reduce Pocket Hematoma.

BACKGROUND

Uninterrupted antithrombotic treatment (ATT) during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation increases bleeding and device-related infections (DRI) risk. The wide-awake-local-anesthesia-no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique, using large-volume local anesthesia and adrenaline, is successful in hand surgeries but its potential to mitigate bleeding risk in CIED implantations remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether WALANT protocol for CIED implantations reduces clinically significant pocket hematoma in patients with a high bleeding risk or is a contraindication for interrupting ATT.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with CIED surgery patients on uninterrupted ATT. They received WALANT protocol (lidocaine 1% with adrenaline 1:100,000) or standard protocol (lidocaine 1%). Following implantation, patients were blindly monitored in the ward and pacemaker clinic. Patients were monitored for bleeding outcomes post-implantation.

RESULTS

Forty-six consecutive patients (73.6 ± 9 years, 72% male) were enrolled. In the WALANT group (n=24) no intra-pocket pro-hemostatic agents were needed, compared to 45% in the control group (P = 0.0002). Postoperative pressure dressings were used in 12.5% vs. 68% (P = 0.0002). WALANT patients had smaller hematoma areas (median 3.7 cm2 IQR [1-39] vs. 46 cm2 [IQR 24-76], P = 0.0004) 1-day postoperative. ATT interruption occurred in 12.5% vs. 18% (P = 0.7). Superficial skin infection rates were 4% vs. 9% (P = 0.6). No DRI occurred. No WALANT-related side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

WALANT protocol in CIED implantation with uninterrupted ATT reduced pro-hemostatic agents, pressure-dressing need, and hematoma size. Larger studies are needed to assess its impact on infection rates.