DOI 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00080
In vitro study of optimal removable partial denture clasp design made from novel high-performance polyetherketoneketone.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the retentive force and deformation of double Akers' polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) clasps on removable partial dentures (RPDs) with varying designs and undercut depths.
METHODS
Thirty double Akers' PEKK clasps with two different widths and heights (Groups I and II) were fabricated using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Each design was further subdivided (n = 5) into three undercut depths (0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mm). The retentive force of the clasps was measured after 10 years of clinical use (15,000 insertion/removal cycles), and the deformation of the clasp tips was analyzed before and after cycling.
RESULTS
Clasps with 0.50-mm and 0.75-mm undercut depths exhibited greater initial retentive forces (3.15-3.51 N) compared to those in the 0.25-mm undercut group (2.40-2.80 N). Group I maintained consistent retentive forces over the cycles (P = 0.345), whereas Group II showed declining forces after the initial use (P < 0.003). In both groups, the 0.50-mm undercut exhibited a greater retentive force than the 0.25-mm (P < 0.001 and P < 0.004, respectively), with no significant differences between the 0.50-mm and 0.75-mm undercut depths. Despite a lower initial retentive force, the 0.25-mm undercut showed less deformation and clasp tip wear.
CONCLUSIONS
The PEKK clasps did not exhibit significantly reduced retentive forces or permanent deformations after 15,000 fatigue cycles. These results suggest that the PEKK polymer displays superior mechanical properties as an esthetic clasp material, and clasps with 0.50-mm and 0.75-mm undercut depths are recommended for long-term clinical use.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.