MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.047

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021

Tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Feng Yimo, Chen Hai

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage remains controversial. Thus, we conduct this meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of tranexamic acid on subarachnoid hemorrhage were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and 2359 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for subarachnoid hemorrhage, tranexamic acid was associated with significantly reduced risk of rebleeding (Odd ratio [OR] =0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.41 to 0.93; P = 0.02), but had no influence on mortality (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.18; P = 0.61), poor outcome (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.48; P = 0.82), hydrocephalus (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.46; P = 0.17) or delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.78 to 2.04; P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid may be effective to reduce the risk of rebleeding in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Для цитирования: Feng Yimo, Chen Hai. Tranexamic acid for subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.