DOI 10.1007/s10096-019-03468-4
The role of therapy with aminoglycoside in the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients infected with polymyxin- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
Аннотация
Kidney transplant recipients are at risk for infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Polymyxin-resistant CRE (PR-CRE) infections are especially difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to characterize PR-CRE infections among kidney transplant recipients and identify risk factors for treatment failure. This retrospective cohort study involved all kidney transplant recipients with PR-CRE infection between 2013 and 2017 at our center. Minimal inhibitory concentrations for polymyxin B were determined by broth microdilution. Carbapenem-resistant genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48), aminoglycoside-resistance genes, and polymyxin-resistant gene mcr-1 were identified by polymerase chain reaction. All but one of the 47PR-CRE infections identified were due to Klebsiella pneumoniae. The most common type of infection (in 54.3%) was urinary tract infection (UTI). Monotherapy was used in 10 cases. Combined treatment regimens included double-carbapenem therapy in 19 cases, oral fosfomycin in 19, and amikacin in 13. Treatment failure occurred in 21 cases (45.7%). Clinical success was achieved 78.9% of patients who used aminoglycosides versus 37.0% of those who not used this drug (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus to be a risk factor for treatment failure; amikacin use and UTI were found to be protective. Nine strains were RmtB producers. Although aminoglycosides constitute an important therapeutic option for PR-CRE infection, the emergence of aminoglycoside resistance could have a major impact on the management of CRE infection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.