MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.011

Медицинская библиотека · Contraception · 2008

Safety of quinacrine contraceptive pellets: results from 10-year follow-up in Vietnam.

Sokal David C, Hieu Do Trong, Loan Nguyen Dinh, Hubacher David, Nanda Kavita, Weiner Debra H, Vach Trinh Huu

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate long-term safety of quinacrine pellets for nonsurgical sterilization among women in Vietnam.

STUDY

DESIGN

Observational cohort study of 2735 women who had quinacrine insertions between 1989 and 1993 compared to 1623 women who received an intrauterine device (IUD).

RESULTS

Cumulative follow-up times for the quinacrine and IUD cohorts were 28,697 and 17,382 person-years, respectively, and losses to follow-up were 6% and 7%, respectively. Quinacrine users had a higher incidence of ectopic pregnancy compared to IUD users (risk ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.54); the risks of cancer, hysterectomy, pelvic/gynecologic surgery and death were similar in the two groups. Two quinacrine insertions appeared to lower the risk of ectopic pregnancy to that of surgical tubal occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of quinacrine in this cohort appeared to have minimal health risks. Other research, including preclinical studies, needs to be considered in an overall evaluation of whether the combination of safety and efficacy provide a basis for quinacrine's approval by appropriate regulatory agencies.

Для цитирования: Sokal David C, Hieu Do Trong, Loan Nguyen Dinh, Hubacher David, Nanda Kavita, Weiner Debra H, Vach Trinh Huu. Safety of quinacrine contraceptive pellets: results from 10-year follow-up in Vietnam.. Contraception. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.