MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta ortopedica mexicana · 2010

[Assessment of patients with distal radius fracture treated with percutaneous fixation].

Elizondo H E, Cárdenas E E, Mendoza J M, Vilchez F C, Mendoza O L, Acosta C O

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The trend in distal radius fracture is towards open reduction and internal fixation; however, treatment with closed reduction and percutaneous nailing continues to provide good results, but physical therapy and appropriate early rehabilitation are needed.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We assessed patients with distal radius fractures treated with reduction with percutaneous maneuvers and nailing; we used clinical functional scales, like the DASH, the Mayo Clinic wrist scale, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain. Patient results were compared at 12 and 24 weeks. We also compared patients with and without rehabilitation.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were assessed using the DASH scale; patients with rehabilitation had a score of 4.3, while those without rehabilitation had a score of 10.5 (p = 0.00001). In the Mayo Clinic scale, patients with rehabilitation had a score of 86.7, while those without rehabilitation had a score of 77.8 (p = 0.00001). The VAS was not significant.

CONCLUSION

All patients showed improvement in their clinical assessment scales. However, when patients with and without rehabilitation are compared, the difference was greater in the Mayo Clinic scale and in the DASH scale.

Для цитирования: Elizondo H E, Cárdenas E E, Mendoza J M, Vilchez F C, Mendoza O L, Acosta C O. [Assessment of patients with distal radius fracture treated with percutaneous fixation].. Acta ortopedica mexicana. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.