MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1015-9584(10)60019-x

Медицинская библиотека · Asian journal of surgery · 2010

Frequency, pattern and management of acute abdomen in dengue fever in Karachi, Pakistan.

Shamim Muhammad

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the frequency, pattern and management of acute abdomen in patients with dengue fever.

METHODS

This descriptive case series is a prospective analysis of acute abdomen in dengue fever that was performed at three secondary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan from June 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008. The inclusion criterion was all patients with confirmed diagnosis of dengue fever. Patients with incomplete laboratory, ultrasound or histopathology data were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 357 patients with dengue fever, 43 (12.04%) had acute abdomen. There were 15 men and 28 women, with a median age of 29 years. These included 26 cases of acute cholecystitis, 7 cases of acute appendicitis, 7 cases of nonspecific peritonitis, and 3 cases of acute pancreatitis. Dengue hemorrhagic fever/shock syndrome was found in acute pancreatitis, and two of these patients died. Emergency surgery was required in eight patients (5 appendectomy and 3 open cholecystectomy). Substantial transfusion of blood and its components was required in eight patients who underwent emergency surgery.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and prompt conservative management of dengue acute abdomen is necessary to avoid mortality and emergency surgery-related morbidity. However, if needed, surgery can be performed with acceptable morbidity.

Для цитирования: Shamim Muhammad. Frequency, pattern and management of acute abdomen in dengue fever in Karachi, Pakistan.. Asian journal of surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/s1015-9584(10)60019-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.