Characteristics of wearing-off and motor symptoms improved by safinamide adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience various motor and non-motor symptoms. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a Japanese phase 2/3 study of safinamide (50 or 100 mg/day) in patients with Parkinson's disease and wearing-off to evaluate response according to background factors. Safinamide efficacy against major motor symptoms was also assessed.
METHODS
Multiple regression analyses in safinamide-treated patients (50 or 100 mg/day) assessed changes in daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia (hereafter referred to as ON-time) according to baseline clinical variables. Subgroup analyses by baseline Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III score were also conducted. We evaluated cardinal motor symptoms using the UPDRS.
RESULTS
In the multiple regression analysis, changes in ON-time were related to baseline non-motor symptoms (UPDRS part I score) and ON-time in the 50-mg group, but no relationships with non-motor symptoms were observed in the 100-mg group. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis of patients with more severe motor symptoms (UPDRS part III score > 20), a significant improvement in ON-time was observed only with 100 mg/day (p = 0.01). At both doses, safinamide significantly improved cardinal motor symptom scores (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, axial symptoms, and gait disturbances).
CONCLUSIONS
The observed response profile to the 50-mg/day dose may be related to baseline non-motor symptoms, but this was not true for the 100-mg/day dose. Both safinamide doses improved major motor symptoms in levodopa-treated patients with PD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.