Association of Physicians of India: National Expert Opinion and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Primary Care Cough Management in India.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Pathological cough in primary care is a significant concern. With a prevalence ranging from 5 to 10% in India, cough is the second most common symptom seen by general practitioners (GPs). The existing algorithms and tools that are available are generally meant for cough categorization in specialized fields; their limited adoption by GPs results in insufficient screening and categorization of cough, which results in the use of irrational fixed drug combination formulations.
OBJECTIVES
Formulation of recommendations for GPs to enable them to appropriately screen and categorize cough for efficient management and avoid irrational treatments.
METHODS
An expert panel (seven experts specializing in pulmonology and internal medicine) held a virtual discussion to assess the necessity for cough categorization and develop user-friendly tools, along with a simplified format for history taking in cough evaluation and management. Panel discussions were based on a questionnaire that contained items related to the categorization of cough, assessment tools, and approaches to treating cough.
RESULTS
After deliberations, simplified clinical practice recommendations and assessment tools were developed by the experts to facilitate the categorization of cough into wet or dry categories, thereby helping in the symptom-based management of cough.
CONCLUSION
By adhering to these principles and using assessment tools, primary care practitioners can optimize cough management, avoid irrational drug combinations, minimize potential risks, and improve patient well-being.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.