DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.1188
Role of endocardial ablation in eliminating an epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with Brugada syndrome.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Epicardial ablation is occasionally limited by coronary artery (CA) injuries or epicardial fat (EF).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomic obstacles that prevent ablation of epicardial abnormal potentials (EAPs) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) and to investigate the feasibility of EAP elimination by endocardial right ventricular (RV) ablation.
METHODS
This study included 16 BrS patients with previous ventricular fibrillation (VF), including 10 with an electrical storm. Data from multidetector computed tomography were assessed, and the proximity of the CA and EF was correlated with EAPs.
RESULTS
EAPs were present in the epicardial RV outflow tract and RV inferior wall in all patients and 12 patients (75%), respectively. These EAPs were present within 5 mm of the main body and branches of the right CA in 14 patients (87.5%). However, only 1.4% ± 2.9% of the EAP area was covered with thick EF (≥8 mm). Partial EAP elimination by endocardial RV ablation was feasible in all 10 patients, with 53.3% successful endocardial RV radiofrequency applications for eliminating EAPs. After the procedure, VF remained inducible in 37.5% of the patients. During the 25.1 ± 29.1 months of follow-up, no patients experienced an electrical storm, and VF burden significantly decreased (median VF episodes before and after ablation: 7 and 0, respectively).
CONCLUSION
EAPs are near the CA in most BrS patients, thereby requiring caution during epicardial ablation, whereas EF is less of an issue. Endocardial ablation is feasible to eliminate some EAPs and may be combined with epicardial ablation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.