DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000001166
Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the Manchester Programme.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To describe the experience of auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in patients with Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2).
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective case review.
SETTING
Tertiary referral centre.
PATIENTS: Implanted with a Cochlear ABI22 or ABI24M between 1994 and 2009 because of NF2 disease.
INTERVENTION(S): Rehabilitative.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surgical complication rate; audiological outcomes.
RESULTS
There were 50 primary ABI insertions in 49 patients, including 16 inserted at the time of first side tumor removal as a sleeper, and two revision repositionings which failed to improve outcome. Postoperatively three patients had cerebrospinal fluid leaks which did not require reoperation, one patient had meningitis, and eleven patients suffered either temporary or permanent lower cranial nerve dysfunction. Twenty-nine patients became full time users; a further 12 patients became non-users. Three patients died while their device was inactive. Five patients retain serviceable contralateral hearing. Audiological open set testing of users showed means of: environmental sounds discrimination 51%; phoneme discrimination: with ABI alone 22%/lip reading (LR) 45%/ABI with LR 65%; sentence testing: with ABI alone 13%/LR 19%/ABI with LR 54%.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of patients with NF2 implanted with an ABI find the device a useful aid to communication in conjunction with LR and in recognizing common environmental sounds. A small proportion gain open set discrimination. Almost a third of patients may end up as non-users. There is probably an increased risk of postoperative lower cranial nerve dysfunction so careful preoperative assessment is advised.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.