European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
Dynamic assessment of global longitudinal strain after isometric exercise to predict functionally significant coronary lesion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mileva Niya, Vassilev Dobrin, Panayotov Panayot, Tsonev Svetlin, Golebiewski Slawomir, Rigatelli Gianluca, Gil Robert J
Аннотация
AIMS: There is still a wide debate regarding the management of patients with chronic coronary syndrome, the choice of optimal non-invasive stress test, and the decision for coronary revascularization. Evidence has accumulated demonstrating the utility of global longitudinal strain (GLS) as a predictor of significant coronary disease. To evaluate the application of speckle tracking during resting echocardiography and after isometric loading with the hand-grip test, and to compare GLS parameters with fractional flow reserve (FFR).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with known CCS who underwent angiography with evidence of coronary stenosis >40%<90% and were referred for functional assessment were enrolled in this study. Patients with previous MI, depressed LV systolic function, and poor acoustic window were excluded. Patients underwent a standard echocardiography with recordings suitable for LV speckle tracking. Subsequently, a dynamic hand-grip test was performed for 3 min, then the same images were captured. Global longitudinal strain was calculated at rest (rGLS), under stress conditions (sGLS), as well as the absolute difference between the two measurements - ΔGLS. Then, patients underwent invasive functional assessment with measurement of the FFR of the coronary lesion. Correlation analysis of myocardial strain parameters and FFR was performed. A total of 106 patients were included in the study. The mean rGLS was -18.5 ± 1.8, sGLS: -19.1 ± 2.0 and ΔGLS: 0.62 ± 1.4. In total, 44% of patients had a functionally significant coronary lesion when assessed with FFR. There was a statistically significant correlation between ΔGLS and FFR values, r = 0.660, P < 0.001. ΔGLS of 0.35 showed good diagnostic performance capacity (AUC 0.896, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, specificity 85%, sensitivity 92%) for a functionally significant coronary lesion.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic GLS during isometric hand-grip exercise is a feasible method for functional assessment in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with known CCS who underwent angiography with evidence of coronary stenosis >40%<90% and were referred for functional assessment were enrolled in this study. Patients with previous MI, depressed LV systolic function, and poor acoustic window were excluded. Patients underwent a standard echocardiography with recordings suitable for LV speckle tracking. Subsequently, a dynamic hand-grip test was performed for 3 min, then the same images were captured. Global longitudinal strain was calculated at rest (rGLS), under stress conditions (sGLS), as well as the absolute difference between the two measurements - ΔGLS. Then, patients underwent invasive functional assessment with measurement of the FFR of the coronary lesion. Correlation analysis of myocardial strain parameters and FFR was performed. A total of 106 patients were included in the study. The mean rGLS was -18.5 ± 1.8, sGLS: -19.1 ± 2.0 and ΔGLS: 0.62 ± 1.4. In total, 44% of patients had a functionally significant coronary lesion when assessed with FFR. There was a statistically significant correlation between ΔGLS and FFR values, r = 0.660, P < 0.001. ΔGLS of 0.35 showed good diagnostic performance capacity (AUC 0.896, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, specificity 85%, sensitivity 92%) for a functionally significant coronary lesion.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic GLS during isometric hand-grip exercise is a feasible method for functional assessment in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.