MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.08.005

Медицинская библиотека · Urology practice · 2016

The Diagnostic and Treatment Patterns of Urologists in the United States for Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome.

Kivlin Dana, Lim Caitlin, Ross Curtis, Whitmore Kristene, Schellato Tia

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome is not completely understood, making it challenging to diagnose and treat. The current literature elucidating this disease process is inconsistent. Without a clear consensus regarding management it is important to evaluate how urologists are treating these patients.

METHODS

Urologists across the United States completed a 19-item survey addressing diagnostic and treatment methods for interstitial cystitis. Participation was voluntary and no compensation was provided to complete the survey.

RESULTS

A total of 95 surveys were completed and returned between December 2012 and January 2013. Of the respondents 92% considered themselves general urologists and most preferred to manage interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome themselves with only 33% referring these patients. Of the respondents 47% believed that the etiology of interstitial cystitis is still unknown. Cystoscopy with hydrodistention was the most common approach to diagnosis (70% of respondents) followed closely by validated symptoms scores (65%). Oral medication was the most commonly used treatment (92% of respondents), of which pentosan polysulfate was the most commonly used agent. Oral medication was followed by intravesical treatment and bladder hydrodistention at 77% and 74% of respondents, respectively. Most urologists ultimately used multimodal therapy. AUA (American Urological Association) guidelines were followed by only 15% of respondent urologists.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome is variable and many urologists use multiple modalities for diagnosis and treatment. This variability in diagnosis and/or treatment reflects the deficiency of our current understanding of this disease process. Until the pathophysiology is better delineated diagnosis and treatment will remain without consensus.

Для цитирования: Kivlin Dana, Lim Caitlin, Ross Curtis, Whitmore Kristene, Schellato Tia. The Diagnostic and Treatment Patterns of Urologists in the United States for Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome.. Urology practice. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.08.005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.