Blood purification · 2025
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Citrate Accumulation in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zheng Yi, Chen Zhiwen, Sun Xiankun, Wang Fang, Tang Xue, Lin Li, Wang Yanyan, Zhang Ling
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is now recommended as the first choice of anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, impaired citrate metabolism can lead to citrate accumulation (CA), resulting in severe metabolic acidosis and hypocalcemia, which poses a challenge for clinicians when making decision about the use of RCA.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study performed in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we evaluated patients who underwent RCA-CRRT from 2021 to 2023. Participants were randomly allocated into training and validation groups at a 7:3 ratio. In the training group, significant risk factors for CA were determined by a binary logistic regression analysis and established a risk prediction model, and the validation group validated and evaluated the model. A nomogram was constructed to visualize the prediction model, calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness.
RESULTS: Of the 1,259 patients with RCA-CRRT, 882 were randomly stratified into the training group and 377 into the validation group. CA was reported in 16.2% and 16.7%, respectively. We developed and validated a nomogram to predict the risk of CA, incorporating significant factors including male, age, body surface area, citrate concentration, systolic blood pressure, lactate, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.737-0.765) and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.744-0.787) in both groups. The calibration curve further confirmed its effective discrimination and calibration abilities. DCA analysis emphasized its clinical utility when the CA probability threshold for intervention is between 11% and 76%.
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a prediction model for CA in critically ill patients who received RCA-CRRT, providing a basis for clinicians to develop individualized anticoagulation protocols.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study performed in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we evaluated patients who underwent RCA-CRRT from 2021 to 2023. Participants were randomly allocated into training and validation groups at a 7:3 ratio. In the training group, significant risk factors for CA were determined by a binary logistic regression analysis and established a risk prediction model, and the validation group validated and evaluated the model. A nomogram was constructed to visualize the prediction model, calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness.
RESULTS: Of the 1,259 patients with RCA-CRRT, 882 were randomly stratified into the training group and 377 into the validation group. CA was reported in 16.2% and 16.7%, respectively. We developed and validated a nomogram to predict the risk of CA, incorporating significant factors including male, age, body surface area, citrate concentration, systolic blood pressure, lactate, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.737-0.765) and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.744-0.787) in both groups. The calibration curve further confirmed its effective discrimination and calibration abilities. DCA analysis emphasized its clinical utility when the CA probability threshold for intervention is between 11% and 76%.
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a prediction model for CA in critically ill patients who received RCA-CRRT, providing a basis for clinicians to develop individualized anticoagulation protocols.