MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01218.x

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of sexual medicine · 2009

An unusual success with simultaneous urethral repair and reimplantation of penile prosthesis in a patient with urethral stricture induced by rotated tubing.

Cui Wan Shou, Kim Sang Deuk, Choi Kyung Soo, Zhao Chen, Park Jong Kwan

Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous urethral repair and reimplantation of penile prosthesis in a patient with urethral stricture induced by rotated tubing of a three piece penile prosthesis has not been reported yet.

AIM: The aim of this study was to present our experience, which overcame severe urethral stricture induced by penile prosthesis implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Uroflowmetry, voding cystourethrogram, function of prosthesis, and complications.

METHODS

We performed one-stage urethroplasty with pedicle island of penile skin and reimplantation of Titan penile prosthesis without abnormal rotation of the cylinder.

RESULTS

The patient voided very well, and the prosthesis worked very well without complications.

CONCLUSION

One-stage urethroplasty with pedicle island of penile skin and reimplantation of a three-piece penile prosthesis in simultaneous stage may be another choice to treat the long-segment urethral stricture occurred by three-piece penile prosthesis implantation.

Для цитирования: Cui Wan Shou, Kim Sang Deuk, Choi Kyung Soo, Zhao Chen, Park Jong Kwan. An unusual success with simultaneous urethral repair and reimplantation of penile prosthesis in a patient with urethral stricture induced by rotated tubing.. The journal of sexual medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01218.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.