American journal of hypertension · 2015
The Effects of Aldosterone Antagonists in Patients With Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.
СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dahal Khagendra, Kunwar Sumit, Rijal Jharendra, Alqatahni Fahad, Panta Raju, Ishak Noshi, Russell Roy Patterson
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A few studies have shown aldosterone antagonists (AA) to be effective therapy in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies of AA in patients with RH.
METHODS: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies on the use of AA in patients with RH. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. The change in office and ambulatory blood pressures (BP), effects on biochemical profile, change in the number of antihypertensive agents, and adverse events were main outcomes.
RESULTS: We included 15 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 nonrandomized comparative study, and 11 single-arm studies) with 1,204 total patients in the meta-analysis. In comparative studies, AA reduced systolic BP (SBP) by 24.26 mm Hg (95% CI: 8.65-39.87, P = 0.002) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 7.79 mm Hg (3.79-11.79, P = 0.0001). Similarly, AA reduced SBP by 22.74 mm Hg (18.21-27.27, P < 0.00001) and DBP by 10.49 mm Hg (8.85-12.13, P < 0.00001) in single-arm studies. AA resulted in significant change in serum electrolytes in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies. Significantly more adverse events were noted in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current meta-analysis, we conclude that AA is safe and effective therapy in patients with RH.
METHODS: We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies on the use of AA in patients with RH. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. The change in office and ambulatory blood pressures (BP), effects on biochemical profile, change in the number of antihypertensive agents, and adverse events were main outcomes.
RESULTS: We included 15 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 nonrandomized comparative study, and 11 single-arm studies) with 1,204 total patients in the meta-analysis. In comparative studies, AA reduced systolic BP (SBP) by 24.26 mm Hg (95% CI: 8.65-39.87, P = 0.002) and diastolic BP (DBP) by 7.79 mm Hg (3.79-11.79, P = 0.0001). Similarly, AA reduced SBP by 22.74 mm Hg (18.21-27.27, P < 0.00001) and DBP by 10.49 mm Hg (8.85-12.13, P < 0.00001) in single-arm studies. AA resulted in significant change in serum electrolytes in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies. Significantly more adverse events were noted in single-arm studies but not in comparative studies.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current meta-analysis, we conclude that AA is safe and effective therapy in patients with RH.