The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 2002
Pelvic pain scores in women without pelvic pathology.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abbott Jason, Hawe Jed, Shaltoot Nahed, Hunter David, Vancaillie Thierry, Garry Ray
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence of and quantify pelvic pain in a group of women without demonstrable pelvic pathology as confirmed by laparoscopy.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task force classification II-2).
SETTING: District general hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred forty-three consecutive women undergoing laparoscopy for sterilization, infertility investigation, or assessment of pelvic pain.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire including a visual analog score for four different types of pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, rectal pain) and three quality of life assessments. Forty-three women were excluded due to pelvic pathology. In the 100 remaining women, mean pain scores (maximum 10) were dysmenorrhea 3.77, pelvic pain 1.75, dyspareunia 1.54, and rectal pain 1.07. Quality of life assessment was no different from that in a healthy population in whom the instruments were validated.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic pain, principally dysmenorrhea, is common in women of reproductive age. Pain scores may be used to compare treatments for pelvic pain and provide useful information for preoperative counseling.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task force classification II-2).
SETTING: District general hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred forty-three consecutive women undergoing laparoscopy for sterilization, infertility investigation, or assessment of pelvic pain.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women were asked to complete a questionnaire including a visual analog score for four different types of pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, rectal pain) and three quality of life assessments. Forty-three women were excluded due to pelvic pathology. In the 100 remaining women, mean pain scores (maximum 10) were dysmenorrhea 3.77, pelvic pain 1.75, dyspareunia 1.54, and rectal pain 1.07. Quality of life assessment was no different from that in a healthy population in whom the instruments were validated.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic pain, principally dysmenorrhea, is common in women of reproductive age. Pain scores may be used to compare treatments for pelvic pain and provide useful information for preoperative counseling.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAge DistributionCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansIncidenceInfertility, FemaleLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPain MeasurementParityPelvic PainProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReference ValuesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexStatistics, Nonparametric