Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
Effectiveness of hypertonic saline with or without hyaluronic acid among patients with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khan Zarghuna, Naeem Muhammad O, Amin Dr Anam, Amin Laraib, Shah Abdullah, Khaliq Saad Ul, Azhar Aima, Naz Sana, Shujauddin Syed M, Arshad Muhammad A, Ali Sarosh J, Sajid Emad U, Jawad Sayed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The clinical effectiveness of hypertonic saline (HS) in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) can be compromised by adverse effects. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) in mitigating these negative occurrences.
METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out using three electronic databases: Medline, Cochrane Central, and Embase. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the efficacy of hypertonic saline (HS) with and without hyaluronic acid (HA) in treating cystic fibrosis. Primary outcomes include the incidence of cough, throat irritation, unpleasant taste, and changes in FEV1. Our findings suggest that adding HA to HS significantly reduces adverse effects and enhances patient tolerability, marking a potential improvement in cystic fibrosis therapy. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were used to present evaluations. The quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (CRBT). The quality of the observational study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: From the 1960 articles retrieved from the initial search, five relevant studies (n=236 patients) were included in the final analysis. Compared with patients only on HS, patients with HS and HA were significantly less likely to experience cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and unpleasant smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09). In addition, patients with HS with HA had significantly less forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79--2.15, P=0.52), compared to patients only on HS. Patients on HA + HS had significantly lower rates of cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and bad smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09) when compared to patients on HS alone. Furthermore, compared to patients solely on HS, patients with HS plus HA exhibited a substantially lower forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79 to -2.15, P=0.52) as well.
CONCLUSION: For CF patients who need ongoing HS therapy and have a history of poor therapy tolerance, adding HA is beneficial.
METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was carried out using three electronic databases: Medline, Cochrane Central, and Embase. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the efficacy of hypertonic saline (HS) with and without hyaluronic acid (HA) in treating cystic fibrosis. Primary outcomes include the incidence of cough, throat irritation, unpleasant taste, and changes in FEV1. Our findings suggest that adding HA to HS significantly reduces adverse effects and enhances patient tolerability, marking a potential improvement in cystic fibrosis therapy. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were used to present evaluations. The quality of RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (CRBT). The quality of the observational study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS: From the 1960 articles retrieved from the initial search, five relevant studies (n=236 patients) were included in the final analysis. Compared with patients only on HS, patients with HS and HA were significantly less likely to experience cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and unpleasant smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09). In addition, patients with HS with HA had significantly less forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79--2.15, P=0.52), compared to patients only on HS. Patients on HA + HS had significantly lower rates of cough (RR: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72, P=0.001), throat irritation (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.81, P=0.009), and bad smell (RR: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80, P=0.09) when compared to patients on HS alone. Furthermore, compared to patients solely on HS, patients with HS plus HA exhibited a substantially lower forced expiratory volume (FEV1) (MD: -2.97; 95% CI, -3.79 to -2.15, P=0.52) as well.
CONCLUSION: For CF patients who need ongoing HS therapy and have a history of poor therapy tolerance, adding HA is beneficial.