The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1993
Intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Caputo R M, Benson J T, McClellan E
Аннотация
Urinary incontinence imposes a large economic burden, estimated at $10 billion per year. As the cost of health care continues to rise, conservative therapeutic measures are becoming more attractive. Anecdotal reports suggest that electrical stimulation may be up to 87% effective in the treatment of urinary incontinence. Investigators use different stimulation devices and protocols and make a comparison of results difficult. The true efficacy of electrical stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence is unknown since there have been no controlled clinical trials. Within our referral-based urogynecology practice, we employ intermittent, intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation in conjunction with bladder drills and pelvic floor exercises. Over a one-year period we treated 76 women with urinary incontinence: 19 with stress incontinence (SUI), 30 with detrusor instability (DI) and 27 with mixed incontinence (MI). After six weeks, our overall objective improvement rate was 76%; 89% of patients with SUI, 73% with DI and 70% with MI met the criteria for improvement. Long-term follow-up averaged 6 months, with a range of 2-12. Of patients who showed an initial objective improvement, 87% maintained that improvement. Intravaginal electrical stimulation may be effective therapy for urinary incontinence. Controlled clinical trials are needed to determine its efficacy and standardize stimulation protocols before its widespread use.