Clinical cardiology · 2015
Treatment of heart failure in real-world clinical practice: findings from the REFLECT-HF registry in patients with NYHA class II symptoms and a reduced ejection fraction.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Böhm Michael, Tschöpe Carsten, Wirtz Jost Henner, Lokies Jan, Turgonyi Eva, Bramlage Peter, Lins Katharina, Strunz Anke M, Tebbe Ulrich
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, plus a diuretic.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that OMT is less often prescribed in HF-REF patients (≤35%) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II symptoms compared with those with NYHA class III/IV symptoms.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter survey of hospital-based cardiologists, office-based cardiologists, and general practitioners in Germany.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 384 patients enrolled, 144 had REF ≤35%. Patients with REF had NYHA class II symptoms in 39.6% (n = 57) and NYHA class III/IV symptoms in 60.4% (n = 87). The REF/NYHA class II group had a higher proportion of males than the REF/NYHA class III/IV group. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers, prescription rates were high and comparable between groups. However, prescription rates for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were lower compared with other guideline-recommended treatments. Multivariate analyses indicated that OMT prescription was reduced for older patients and increased for patients cared for by an office-based cardiologist.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high proportion of patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function but only minor symptoms, HF-REF appears to be underdiagnosed, and a higher proportion of patients than are currently recognized could potentially be candidates for OMT.
HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that OMT is less often prescribed in HF-REF patients (≤35%) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II symptoms compared with those with NYHA class III/IV symptoms.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter survey of hospital-based cardiologists, office-based cardiologists, and general practitioners in Germany.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 384 patients enrolled, 144 had REF ≤35%. Patients with REF had NYHA class II symptoms in 39.6% (n = 57) and NYHA class III/IV symptoms in 60.4% (n = 87). The REF/NYHA class II group had a higher proportion of males than the REF/NYHA class III/IV group. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers, prescription rates were high and comparable between groups. However, prescription rates for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were lower compared with other guideline-recommended treatments. Multivariate analyses indicated that OMT prescription was reduced for older patients and increased for patients cared for by an office-based cardiologist.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high proportion of patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function but only minor symptoms, HF-REF appears to be underdiagnosed, and a higher proportion of patients than are currently recognized could potentially be candidates for OMT.