[Nutritional assessment in infants with congenital heart disease: comparison of two anthropometric classifications].

INTRODUCTION

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) present a high percentage of undern utrition and the interpretation of their nutritional assessment is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the nutritional status of infants with CHD using two anthropometric classifications and compare them.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: Non-concurrent cohort study. We studied children under 12 months under going cardiac surgery. We excluded preterm infants, small for gestational age, carriers of genetic syndrome or other disease with nutritional compromise. Demographic data, type of CHD, weight and height were recorded. Nutritional assessment was performed using WHO standards per health ministry criteria (HMC) and per an Integrated Anthropometric Classification (IAC), which defines undernutrition if height-for-age Z-score (ZT/E)≤-2 and/or weight-for-height (ZP/T)≤-2, risk of un dernutrition as ZP/T between -1 to -1,9, normal as ZP/T between -0.9 to +0.9, overweight as ZP/T between +1 to +1.9 and obesity as ZP/T≥+2.

RESULTS

387 interventions were included, 219 (56.6%) were males, median age 3.1 months (IQR:0.4;6.4). A 26.4% presented short stature. Using HMC classification 55 subjects presented two diagnoses by overlap of ZP/E and ZP/T, although with IAC there was no overlap. Comparing HMC with IAC, a difference was found in undernutrition, 28.9% versus 38.5% (p = 0.001), risk of undernutrition 27.4% versus 16.3%(p = 0.01) and obesity 4.9% ver sus 3.3% (p = 0.03) respectively. Correlation was found between ZP/E and ZP/T, r = 0.6(p < 0.001) and between ZP/E and ZT/E, r = 0.6 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with CHD have a high per centage of undernutrition and short stature. Using the same anthropometric measurements IAC did not present overlapping diagnoses and detected more undernutrition. P/E is useful as screening, but insufficient in chronic undernutrition.