The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2021
Survival of Patients With Mild Secondary Mitral Regurgitation With and Without Mild Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mori Makoto, Weininger Gabe, Agarwal Ritu, Shang Michael, Amabile Andrea, Kahler-Quesada Arianna, Yousef Sameh, Pichert Matthew, Vallabhajosyula Prashanth, Zhang Yawei, Sugeng Lissa, Geirsson Arnar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mild secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is considered clinically benign when left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is preserved, but evidence on survival associated with mild SMR in normal LVEF is limited.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent echocardiography in a health care network between 2013 and 2018. We compared the survival of 4 groups: no valvular abnormalities (group 1), trace SMR with trace or mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (group 2), mild SMR with trace or no TR (group 3), and mild SMR with mild TR (group 4). A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated hazard of death in groups 2 to 4 compared with group 1, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and LVEF. The same comparisons were repeated in a subgroup of patients with preserved LVEF.
RESULTS: Among the 16,372 patients of mean age 61 (51 to 71) years and 48% women, there were 8132 (49.7%) group 1 patients, 1902 (11.6%) group 2 patients, 3017 (18.4%) group 3 patients, and 3321 (20.3%) group 4 patients. Compared with group 1, group 4 had significantly increased adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.31; P < 0.001), whereas groups 2 and 3 did not show a significantly different hazard of death. In those with preserved LVEF, the hazard was also significantly higher in group 4, compared with group 1 (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.26; P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Mild SMR with mild TR, irrespective of LVEF, was associated with worse survival compared with patients without any valvular abnormalities. Patients with mild SMR may require closer monitoring, even with normal LVEF.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent echocardiography in a health care network between 2013 and 2018. We compared the survival of 4 groups: no valvular abnormalities (group 1), trace SMR with trace or mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (group 2), mild SMR with trace or no TR (group 3), and mild SMR with mild TR (group 4). A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated hazard of death in groups 2 to 4 compared with group 1, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and LVEF. The same comparisons were repeated in a subgroup of patients with preserved LVEF.
RESULTS: Among the 16,372 patients of mean age 61 (51 to 71) years and 48% women, there were 8132 (49.7%) group 1 patients, 1902 (11.6%) group 2 patients, 3017 (18.4%) group 3 patients, and 3321 (20.3%) group 4 patients. Compared with group 1, group 4 had significantly increased adjusted hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.31; P < 0.001), whereas groups 2 and 3 did not show a significantly different hazard of death. In those with preserved LVEF, the hazard was also significantly higher in group 4, compared with group 1 (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.26; P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Mild SMR with mild TR, irrespective of LVEF, was associated with worse survival compared with patients without any valvular abnormalities. Patients with mild SMR may require closer monitoring, even with normal LVEF.