MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.500

Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology · 2009

[Idiopathic elephantiasis of the penis: a case report].

Yamamoto Keisuke, Matsuoka Yasuhiro, Takao Tetsuya, Tsujimur Akira, Okuyama Akihiko, Kubo Tateki, Hosokawa Kou, Kakuta Yoichi, Yamaguchi Seiji

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report a case of idiopathic elephantiasis of penis. A 41-year-old man was refered to our hospital with a painful penile swelling and severe miction pain. He had no particular past or familial history, and had never been to tropical or semitropical region. Physical examination showed a prominent swelling and flection of his penis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a significant thickening of the penile skin and subcutaneous tissue. Due to the difficulty of voiding, an urethral catheter was placed. The penile skin biopsy showed no malignancy. Under the diagnosis of penile elephantiasis, the resection of abnormal penile skin and penile plasty with the split skin graft from his thigh was performed. Histopathological findings showed nonspecific inflammation. The skin graft was successfully adapted. He could urinate smoothly without pain after the urethral catheter was removed. There has been no recurrence 6 months after the operation. He recovered normal micturition and sexual function.

Для цитирования: Yamamoto Keisuke, Matsuoka Yasuhiro, Takao Tetsuya, Tsujimur Akira, Okuyama Akihiko, Kubo Tateki, Hosokawa Kou, Kakuta Yoichi, Yamaguchi Seiji. [Idiopathic elephantiasis of the penis: a case report].. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology. 2009. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.500.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.