The American journal of emergency medicine · 2013
Outcome and adverse events with 72-hour cooling at 32°C as compared to 24-hour cooling at 33°C in comatose asphyxial arrest survivors.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Byung Kook, Lee Seung Joon, Jeung Kyung Woon, Lee Hyoung Youn, Heo Tag, Min Yong Il
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Studies suggest that the current therapeutic hypothermia (TH) protocol does not improve outcomes in adult asphyxial arrest survivors. We sought to compare the effect of 24-hour cooling at 33°C vs that of 72-hour cooling at 32°C on outcomes and the incidence of adverse events in unconscious asphyxial arrest survivors.
METHODS: Retrospectively collected data on 79 consecutive asphyxial arrest patients treated with TH from January 2006 to March 2013 were analyzed. Forty-one patients who presented between January 2006 and January 2011 formed the 33°C-24 h group, whereas 38 patients who presented between February 2011 and March 2013 formed the 32°C-72 h group. The primary outcome was neurologic outcome at 30 days following arrest. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 30 days following arrest and the incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant difference in survival over time during the 30 days after arrest between the 2 groups (P = .608). Good neurologic outcome was achieved in only 2 patients (2.5%) of the overall cohort, despite TH. One of the 32°C-72 h group (2.6%; 95% confidence interval, 4.7%-13.5%) had a good neurologic outcome, as did one of the 33°C-24 h group (2.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3%-12.6%) (P = 1.000). There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse events between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: The present study did not demonstrate an advantage of 72-hour cooling at 32°C in unconscious asphyxial arrest patients compared with 24-hour cooling at 33°C.
METHODS: Retrospectively collected data on 79 consecutive asphyxial arrest patients treated with TH from January 2006 to March 2013 were analyzed. Forty-one patients who presented between January 2006 and January 2011 formed the 33°C-24 h group, whereas 38 patients who presented between February 2011 and March 2013 formed the 32°C-72 h group. The primary outcome was neurologic outcome at 30 days following arrest. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 30 days following arrest and the incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curve showed no significant difference in survival over time during the 30 days after arrest between the 2 groups (P = .608). Good neurologic outcome was achieved in only 2 patients (2.5%) of the overall cohort, despite TH. One of the 32°C-72 h group (2.6%; 95% confidence interval, 4.7%-13.5%) had a good neurologic outcome, as did one of the 33°C-24 h group (2.4%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3%-12.6%) (P = 1.000). There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse events between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: The present study did not demonstrate an advantage of 72-hour cooling at 32°C in unconscious asphyxial arrest patients compared with 24-hour cooling at 33°C.