MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1308/003588409x391875

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2009

Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: comparison of postoperative oral and perineal morbidity.

Abdel-Galil Khalid, Eardley Ian, Loukota Richard

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A prospective study of postoperative oral and perineal pain experienced by a group of patients undergoing buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethral reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A consecutive group of 24 male patients undergoing buccal mucosa graft harvest for urethral reconstruction of stricture disease was prospectively studied between June 2006 and December 2008. All patients were examined pre-operatively and entered into the study prospectively. After surgery, all patients were reviewed at 24 h and 48 h. On both occasions, they were asked to complete a proforma containing visual analogue pain scales for both the oral donor site as well as the perineum.

RESULTS

A statistically significant higher level of pain was experienced from the perineum than the oral donor site on both the first and second postoperative days.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparative analysis of visual analogue pain scale scores between oral donor site and perineum showed that patients experience significantly more pain from the latter postoperatively.

Для цитирования: Abdel-Galil Khalid, Eardley Ian, Loukota Richard. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: comparison of postoperative oral and perineal morbidity.. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009. DOI: 10.1308/003588409x391875.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.