Gynecologic oncology · 2015
The diagnostic process of cervical cancer; areas of good practice, and windows of opportunity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zaal Afra, de Wilde Marlieke A, Duk M Jitze, Graziosi G C, van Haaften Maarten, von Mensdorff-Pouilly Silvia, van Diest Paul J, Zweemer Ronald P, Peeters Petra H, Verheijen René H M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Despite an extensive screening programme in The Netherlands, some cases of cervical cancer are still diagnosed in late stages of disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate which elements in the diagnostic process of cervical cancer may be improved.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 120 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed between January 1st 2008 and June 1st 2010 at the University Medical Center Utrecht. Patient charts, referral information, and pathology results were analyzed.
RESULTS: 39.1% of cancer cases were screen or interval detected; the other 60.9% of patients had not been screened, either due to non-attendance or because they fell outside the age range for screening. The final diagnosis of cervical cancer was established by biopsy in 77 (64.2%) and by excision of the cervical transformation zone in 35 (29.2%) of the patients. Fifteen (43%) of these excisions could have been avoided if biopsies would have been taken at the first examination, and had shown invasive cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer screening aims at early detection of precursor lesions to decrease the incidence of cancer. This in-depth analysis suggests that improvement of quality of care is to be expected from correct recognition of cervical cancer by physicians and adjustments of the screening programme to reach younger women and non-responders.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 120 patients with cervical cancer diagnosed between January 1st 2008 and June 1st 2010 at the University Medical Center Utrecht. Patient charts, referral information, and pathology results were analyzed.
RESULTS: 39.1% of cancer cases were screen or interval detected; the other 60.9% of patients had not been screened, either due to non-attendance or because they fell outside the age range for screening. The final diagnosis of cervical cancer was established by biopsy in 77 (64.2%) and by excision of the cervical transformation zone in 35 (29.2%) of the patients. Fifteen (43%) of these excisions could have been avoided if biopsies would have been taken at the first examination, and had shown invasive cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer screening aims at early detection of precursor lesions to decrease the incidence of cancer. This in-depth analysis suggests that improvement of quality of care is to be expected from correct recognition of cervical cancer by physicians and adjustments of the screening programme to reach younger women and non-responders.