Irish journal of medical science · 2020
Two-hole versus four-hole plate dynamic hip screw: a systematic review of current evidence.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davey Martin S, Flynn Sean O, Hayes Joshua, Feeley Iain, Grant Freemantle Marc C, Burke Neil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The dynamic hip screw (DHS) is a common device used in the fixation of hip fractures. Traditionally, this involves the use of a four-hole side plate. Reducing the length of the side plate would theoretically reduce the amount of surgical exposure required, decrease surgery duration, and decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Our study aims to review the current evidence regarding the use of two-hole side plates, their use and potential complications.
METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a search to collate the available literature from medical databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Only clinical and biochemical studies were included. The reference lists of articles included for full text review were searched for any additional primary or review publications.
RESULTS: Four online libraries were searched, with a combined total of 5344 titles reviewed. Following title, abstract, and full text review, 8 articles were considered suitable for inclusion in qualitative analysis. There was a trend towards equal efficiency between two- and four-hole plates when used in stable fractures in terms of blood loss, failure/revision rates, operative and hospital stay durations, collapse loading testing, maximum stress, and fragment migration.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that DHS constructs with two- or four-hole side plates have comparable outcomes when used in patients with stable fracture patterns. However, the majority of the clinical data regarding the use of two-hole DHS plates come from retrospective case series; further prospective, randomised control trials would be of significant benefit.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; systematic review of all levels of evidence.
METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, two independent reviewers performed a search to collate the available literature from medical databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Only clinical and biochemical studies were included. The reference lists of articles included for full text review were searched for any additional primary or review publications.
RESULTS: Four online libraries were searched, with a combined total of 5344 titles reviewed. Following title, abstract, and full text review, 8 articles were considered suitable for inclusion in qualitative analysis. There was a trend towards equal efficiency between two- and four-hole plates when used in stable fractures in terms of blood loss, failure/revision rates, operative and hospital stay durations, collapse loading testing, maximum stress, and fragment migration.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that DHS constructs with two- or four-hole side plates have comparable outcomes when used in patients with stable fracture patterns. However, the majority of the clinical data regarding the use of two-hole DHS plates come from retrospective case series; further prospective, randomised control trials would be of significant benefit.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II; systematic review of all levels of evidence.