MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s41999-026-01418-w

Медицинская библиотека · European geriatric medicine · 2026

Global education and training in geriatrics: mapping transnational initiatives and their complementarities.

Romero-Ortuño Román, Arai Hidenori, Assantachai Prasert, Avila Funes José Alberto, Farrugia-Bonello Rosette, Casey Siobhan, Chen Liang-Kung, Cheung Gary, Dhesi Jugdeep, Ecarnot Fiona, Flicker Leon, Fülöp Tamàs, Goel Ashish, Gordon Adam L, Gouiaa Radhouane, Gregson Celia L, Gutiérrez Robledo Luis Miguel, Jauregui José Ricardo, Kotsani Marina, Macijauskienė Jūratė, Maggi Stefania, Martin Finbarr C, Masud Tahir, Merchant Reshma A, Michel Jean-Pierre, Montero-Odasso Manuel, Morsch Patricia, Münzer Thomas, Nair Balakrishnan Kichu, Parodi José F, Pearson Grace M E, Petrovic Mirko, Piotrowicz Karolina, Roller-Wirnsberger Regina, Sieber Cornel C, Sneddon Gregor, Tan Maw Pin, van der Velde Nathalie, Wee Rohan, Vassallo Michael, Polidori M Cristina

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To map and characterise major transnational initiatives in geriatrics education and training, and explore complementarities as a basis for a more integrated and equitable global framework.

METHODS

A mapping exercise and expert consultation were undertaken by the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) Special Interest Group on Education and Training between January and October 2025, including a meeting of international experts during the Twenty-First EuGMS Congress in Reykjavík. Eligible initiatives operated across national borders with an explicit mandate in education and training related to geriatrics and were not confined to a specific topic or subspecialty. Each initiative was profiled by scope, target audience, and contributions, and classified within a three-tier framework: (1) foundational capacity-building, (2) professional and interprofessional development, and (3) leadership and specialist advancement.

RESULTS

Seventeen initiatives were identified. Tier 1 included the International Federation on Ageing (IFA), International Institute on Ageing, United Nations-Malta (INIA), PAHO's ACAPEM (Basic), ASEAN's Centre for Active Ageing and Innovation (ASEAN-ACAI), IAGG's e-Training in Gerontology and Geriatrics (e-TRIGGER) programmes, WHO's Integrated Care for Older People (WHO ICOPE approach), and AfriAGE. Tier 2 included the IAGG, EuGMS, EICA, PROGRAMMING CA2112, Victorian Geriatric Medicine Training Programme (VGMTP), and ACAPEM (Intermediate); and Tier 3 was represented by leadership academies (EAMA, ALMA, MEAMA/MENAAA, and AAMA), and UEMS-GMS.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these programmes form a considerably disjointed but potentially complementary global ecosystem for geriatrics education. Greater mutual awareness and alignment, anchored in equity and interprofessional inclusion, could enhance efficiency and sustainability in developing the global geriatrics workforce.

Для цитирования: Romero-Ortuño Román, Arai Hidenori, Assantachai Prasert, Avila Funes José Alberto, Farrugia-Bonello Rosette, Casey Siobhan, Chen Liang-Kung, Cheung Gary, Dhesi Jugdeep, Ecarnot Fiona, Flicker Leon, Fülöp Tamàs, Goel Ashish, Gordon Adam L, Gouiaa Radhouane, Gregson Celia L, Gutiérrez Robledo Luis Miguel, Jauregui José Ricardo, Kotsani Marina, Macijauskienė Jūratė, Maggi Stefania, Martin Finbarr C, Masud Tahir, Merchant Reshma A, Michel Jean-Pierre, Montero-Odasso Manuel, Morsch Patricia, Münzer Thomas, Nair Balakrishnan Kichu, Parodi José F, Pearson Grace M E, Petrovic Mirko, Piotrowicz Karolina, Roller-Wirnsberger Regina, Sieber Cornel C, Sneddon Gregor, Tan Maw Pin, van der Velde Nathalie, Wee Rohan, Vassallo Michael, Polidori M Cristina. Global education and training in geriatrics: mapping transnational initiatives and their complementarities.. European geriatric medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-026-01418-w.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.