World neurosurgery · 2021
Ventriculoatrial Shunting: An Escape Option in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Failing Ventriculoperitoneal Drainage.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Di Rienzo Alessandro, Carrassi Erika, Dobran Mauro, Colasanti Roberto, Capece Mara, Aiudi Denis, Iacoangeli Maurizio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting is widely accepted as the gold-standard treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, a restricted group of patients experience only minimal or no improvement after the operation. In such cases, the question whether the diagnosis was incorrect or the shunt is malfunctioning remains unanswered.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on a 10-year series of VP-shunted patients with iNPH showing transient or minimal improvement of symptoms within 3 weeks from surgery. A full workup (including noninvasive diagnostic, cognitive, and invasive tests) was performed. After ruling out mechanical malfunction, we performed a tap test followed by a Katzman test 2 weeks later. The confirmed persistence of disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics was treated by shunt revision and, if found working, by its replacement into the atrial cavity.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were diagnosed with shunt insufficiency. At surgery, the distal end of the shunt was easily extruded and found working in all cases. It was then repositioned into the right atrium (the first 8 patients of the series also underwent failed contralateral abdominal replacement). Early postoperative clinical improvement was always confirmed. In 1 case, shunt overdrainage was corrected by valve upregulation.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, inadequate distal end placement of a shunt might be one of the reasons needing investigation in patients with iNPH failing improvement after surgery. In such situations, the conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt proved to be a low-cost and successful treatment option.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on a 10-year series of VP-shunted patients with iNPH showing transient or minimal improvement of symptoms within 3 weeks from surgery. A full workup (including noninvasive diagnostic, cognitive, and invasive tests) was performed. After ruling out mechanical malfunction, we performed a tap test followed by a Katzman test 2 weeks later. The confirmed persistence of disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics was treated by shunt revision and, if found working, by its replacement into the atrial cavity.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were diagnosed with shunt insufficiency. At surgery, the distal end of the shunt was easily extruded and found working in all cases. It was then repositioned into the right atrium (the first 8 patients of the series also underwent failed contralateral abdominal replacement). Early postoperative clinical improvement was always confirmed. In 1 case, shunt overdrainage was corrected by valve upregulation.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, inadequate distal end placement of a shunt might be one of the reasons needing investigation in patients with iNPH failing improvement after surgery. In such situations, the conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt proved to be a low-cost and successful treatment option.