American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 1998
Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities: still an option compared with core needle biopsy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hall J A, Murphy D C, Hall B R, Hall K A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to present information about open surgical biopsy. It is hoped that this will be helpful when reviewing information about core needle biopsy
STUDY DESIGN: Review of 461 open surgical biopsies for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities was performed. All patients were managed by the Women's Health Center of Logansport. Core needle biopsy data came from the literature.
RESULTS: Open surgical biopsy compared favorably to core needle biopsy with regard to accuracy, cost, patient convenience, recovery, adequacy of specimen, identification of primary site, and cosmetics.
CONCLUSION: Despite core needle biopsy marketing, open surgical biopsy has its advantages and should not be relegated to the museum.
STUDY DESIGN: Review of 461 open surgical biopsies for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities was performed. All patients were managed by the Women's Health Center of Logansport. Core needle biopsy data came from the literature.
RESULTS: Open surgical biopsy compared favorably to core needle biopsy with regard to accuracy, cost, patient convenience, recovery, adequacy of specimen, identification of primary site, and cosmetics.
CONCLUSION: Despite core needle biopsy marketing, open surgical biopsy has its advantages and should not be relegated to the museum.