Mutation research · 1997
Molecular analysis of ERCC2 mutations in the repair deficient hamster mutants UVL-1 and V-H1.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kadkhodayan S, Salazar E P, Ramsey M J, Takayama K, Zdzienicka M Z, Tucker J D, Weber C A
Аннотация
The cDNA sequence of the Chinese hamster ERCC2 nucleotide excision repair and transcription gene from the UVL-1 Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cell line and the V-H1 Chinese hamster V79 mutant line was analyzed. ERCC2 encodes a presumed ATP-dependent DNA helicase and is single copy in CHO lines due to the structural hemizygosity of chromosome 9. Both UVL-1 and V-H1 have intermediate levels of (6-4) photoproduct repair but are as highly UV sensitive as the group 2 mutants that have no detectable repair. Deficiency in cyclobutane dimer removal has also been shown for V-H1. In UVL-1, a single base substitution resulting in an Arg75-->Trp substitution in helicase domain Ia was identified. The equivalent amino acid position is also Arg in the human, mouse, Xiphophorus maculatus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologs. In V-H1, a single base substitution resulting in a Thr46-->Ile substitution in helicase domain I (the ATP-binding domain) was identified in both alleles. The equivalent amino acid position is also Thr in the five homologs. Analysis of three V-H1 partial revertants revealed that they still have the original V-H1 mutation in both alleles, indicating that these are second site reversion events. Site-specific mutagenesis was used to introduce the Thr46-->Ile, Arg75-->Trp, and Lys48-->Arg (helicase domain I) mutations into a hamster ERCC2 expression plasmid. These plasmids each failed to confer UV resistance to group 2 mutant cells, further demonstrating that the changes identified are the causative mutations in V-H1 and UVL-1. Correlations between specific mutations, biochemical activities, and repair phenotype are discussed.