MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jramc-2018-000979

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2018

A comparison of CT lung voxel density analysis in a blast and non blast injured casualty.

Bourn Sebastian, E Scott T, J Hulse E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Primary blast lung injury (PBLI) is a prominent feature in casualties following exposure to blast. PBLI carries high morbidity and mortality, but remains difficult to diagnose and quantify. Radiographic diagnosis of PBLI was historically made with the aid of plain radiographs; more recently, qualitative review of CT images has assisted diagnosis.

METHODS

We report a novel way of measuring post-traumatic acute lung injury using CT lung density analysis in two casualties. One casualty presented following blast exposure with confirmed blast lung injury and the other presented following extremity injury without blast exposure. Three-dimensional lung maps of each casualty were produced from their original trauma CT scan. Analysis of the lung maps allowed quantitative radiological comparison exposing areas of reduced aeration of the patient's lungs.

RESULTS

45% of the blast-exposed lungs were non-aerated compared with 10% in the non-blast-exposed lungs.

DISCUSSION: In these example cases quantitative CT lung density analysis allowed blast-injured lungs to be distinguished from non-blast-exposed lungs.

Для цитирования: Bourn Sebastian, E Scott T, J Hulse E. A comparison of CT lung voxel density analysis in a blast and non blast injured casualty.. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 2018. DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2018-000979.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.